🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he endured defeat by Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining the team's best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his nine months of experience with the Saints, to regard him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director , after being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Supreme Authority Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style of play “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss him for playing too much that system. Hire the project manager and later discard them for requiring excessive time. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.