🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to employ a newly configured congressional map that may create as many as five additional GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three ruling, issued on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to set aside a lower court's injunction that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disrupting the sensitive federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its decision.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to use the districts drawn after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Stinging Dissent

With a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its opinion was written by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its boosted political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Struggle

This decision is part of a nationwide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican control. Typically, redistricting occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that are estimated to yield several additional conservative seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have pushed back with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas top lawyer hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

In contrast, opposition party leaders decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

Another senior Democratic figure argued the court had another time eroded its standing by rubber-stamping a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.